Hello Krzysztof, Thanks a lot for your feedback. On 06/26/2014 12:08 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On śro, 2014-06-25 at 21:03 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> The MAX77802 PMIC has 10 high-efficiency Buck and 32 Low-dropout >> (LDO) regulators. This patch adds support for all these regulators >> found on the MAX77802 PMIC and is based on a driver added by Simon >> Glass to the Chrome OS kernel 3.8 tree. >> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> Changes since v3: >> - Set the supply_name for regulators to lookup their parent supply node. >> Suggested by Mark Brown. >> - Change Exyno5 for Exynos5420/Exynos5800 in regulator driver Kconfig. >> Suggested by Doug Anderson. >> >> Changes since v2: >> - Use dev_warn() instead pr_warn(). Suggested by Mark Brown. >> - Add a generic function to regmap core to copy registers instead of >> having a driver-specific function. Suggested by Mark Brown. >> - Remove unnecessary probe debug log. Suggested by Mark Brown. >> - Set struct regulator_config dev field to MFD instead of the platform dev. >> Suggested by Mark Brown. >> - Read the regulators operational mode from the hardware registers instead >> of setting to normal as default on probe. Suggested by Mark Brown. >> - Remove unnecessary cross-subsystem dependencies. Suggested by Lee Jones. >> >> Changes since v1: >> - Remove unneeded check if num_regulators != MAX77802_MAX_REGULATORS. >> - Fix .set_suspend_mode handler comment and split regulators ops for >> regulators that behave differently. Suggested by Mark Brown. >> - Use module_platform_driver() instead of having init/exit functions. >> Suggested by Mark Brown. >> - Use the new descriptor-based GPIO interface instead of the deprecated >> integer based GPIO one. Suggested by Mark Brown. >> - Look for "regulators" child node instead of "voltage-regulators" to be >> consistent with other PMIC drivers. Suggested by Mark Brown. > > (...) > >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF >> +static int max77802_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev, >> + struct max77802_platform_data *pdata) >> +{ >> + struct max77802_dev *iodev = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); >> + struct device_node *pmic_np, *regulators_np; >> + struct max77802_regulator_data *rdata; >> + struct of_regulator_match rmatch; >> + unsigned int i; >> + >> + pmic_np = iodev->dev->of_node; >> + regulators_np = of_get_child_by_name(pmic_np, "regulators"); >> + if (!regulators_np) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not find regulators sub-node\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + pdata->num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(regulators); >> + rdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*rdata) * >> + pdata->num_regulators, GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!rdata) { >> + of_node_put(regulators_np); >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + } >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < pdata->num_regulators; i++) { >> + rmatch.name = regulators[i].name; >> + rmatch.init_data = NULL; >> + rmatch.of_node = NULL; >> + if (of_regulator_match(&pdev->dev, regulators_np, &rmatch, >> + 1) != 1) { >> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "No matching regulator for '%s'\n", >> + rmatch.name); >> + continue; >> + } >> + rdata[i].initdata = rmatch.init_data; >> + rdata[i].of_node = rmatch.of_node; >> + rdata[i].id = regulators[i].id; >> + } > > I think instead of matching one by one you can alternatively match > everything at once: > > static struct of_regulator_match regulator_matches[] = { > { .name = "LDO1", }, > .... > }; > > if (of_regulator_match(&pdev->dev, regulators_np, regulator_matches, > ARRAY_SIZE(regulator_matches)) { > > The code would be smaller although you would have to create an array > with names of regulators. I'll leave it up to you since I don't have > preference for it. > It's true that the code will be smaller and even more efficient by passing an array of struct of_regulator_match instad but as you said I'll have to add yet-another-table with duplicates information that is already present in the struct regulator_desc regulators[] array. That's why I prefer the code as it right now since I think that there are just too many data structures in this driver. But I don't mind to use the other approach though if you think that it's better. > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > > > Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html