Hello Doug, Thanks a lot for your feedback. On 06/25/2014 08:06 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Javier, > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas > <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> @@ -33,6 +38,6 @@ Example: Clock consumer node >> foo@0 { >> compatible = "bar,foo"; >> /* ... */ >> - clock-names = "my-clock"; >> - clocks = <&max77686 2>; >> + clock-names = "32khz_pmic"; >> + clocks = <&max77686 MAX77686_CLK_PMIC>; > > A minor comment here is that you probably shouldn't change "clock-names". > > The "clock-names" is the consumer's concept of the clock name and not > the producer's concept. If this clock were specified as going into > the TPM, for instance, the TPM might call it "32k-reference". Then > the TPM would get the clock by referring to this name in its driver. > > -Doug > You're right. I won't change the clock names in the next version of the patch-set. Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html