On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:45:56PM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:36:26PM +0100, Christian Eggers wrote: > > Should ptp_sysfs be extended with a "pulse" attribute with calls > > enable() with only PTP_PEROUT_DUTY_CYCLE set? > > Yes, that would make sense. It would bring sysfs back to feature > parity with the ioctls. Which is a good thing? Anyway, Christian, if you do decide to do that, here's some context why I didn't do it when I added the additional knobs for periodic output: https://www.mail-archive.com/linuxptp-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg04150.html
