It was <2020-12-02 śro 09:18>, when Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 11:46:28 +0100 Lukasz Stelmach wrote: >> >> + status = netif_rx(skb); >> > >> > If I'm reading things right this is in process context, so netif_rx_ni() >> > >> >> Is it? The stack looks as follows >> >> ax88796c_skb_return() >> ax88796c_rx_fixup() >> ax88796c_receive() >> ax88796c_process_isr() >> ax88796c_work() >> >> and ax88796c_work() is a scheduled in the system_wq. > > Are you asking if work queue gets run in process context? It does. > Thanks. Changed. >> >> + if (status != NET_RX_SUCCESS) >> >> + netif_info(ax_local, rx_err, ndev, >> >> + "netif_rx status %d\n", status); >> > >> > Again, it's inadvisable to put per packet prints without any rate >> > limiting in the data path. >> >> Even if limmited by the msglvl flag, which is off by default? > > I'd err on the side of caution, but up to you. > It isn't very common, but a few drivers do this. Thank you. -- Łukasz Stelmach Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature