On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 04:02:09PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue 01 Dec 20, 13:14, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 03:28:29PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > Since the CSI controller binding is getting a bit more complex due
> > > to the addition of MIPI CSI-2 bridge support, make the ports node
> > > explicit with the parallel port.
> > >
> > > This way, it's clear that the controller only supports parallel
> > > interface input and there's no confusion about the port number.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi
> > > index 9be13378d4df..02b698cace6a 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi
> > > @@ -803,6 +803,15 @@ csi: camera@1cb0000 {
> > > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > pinctrl-0 = <&csi_pins>;
> > > status = "disabled";
> > > +
> > > + ports {
> > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > > +
> > > + csi_in_parallel: port@0 {
> > > + reg = <0>;
> > > + };
> > > + };
> > > };
> >
> > This will create a DTC warning, since port@0 is the only node, and is
> > equivalent to port
>
> I'm not seeing the warning when running dtbs_check.
Some are silenced by the Linux build system. You can pass W=1 to your
make command line enable all of them.
> More generally, why is it a problem that there's only one node defined?
>
> One issue that I did see is that the port node doesn't have an endpoint
> here, so I will remove the requirement to have an endpoint in the bindings
> documentation to allow this kind of definition.
We definitely want to have the endpoint required. If the CSI node is
disabled, the error should be ignored by the dt-validate tool though
Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
