On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:13:01 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 10/26/20 4:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
> > These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
> > have the same meaning:
> > 1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> > 2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> >
> > Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
> > logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
> > ACTIVE_LOW => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
> > ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # for tcan4x5x.txt
>
> Jakub, can you queue this patch for net/master?
Sure! Are these correct?
Fixes: a1a8b4594f8d ("NFC: pn544: i2c: Add DTS Documentation")
Fixes: 6be88670fc59 ("NFC: nxp-nci_i2c: Add I2C support to NXP NCI driver")
Fixes: e3b329221567 ("dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: Update binding to use interrupt property")
