Andreas,
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's vsys-l{1,2}-supply, not vsys_l{1,2}-supply.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> index 34098023..ca69f5e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ Example:
> infet5-supply = <&some_reg>;
> infet6-supply = <&some_reg>;
> infet7-supply = <&some_reg>;
> - vsys_l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
> - vsys_l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
> + vsys-l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
> + vsys-l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
Your change matches the code and all existing device trees in the
Linux kernel. I also see plenty of other bindings with dashes, so
this seems reasonable.
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
