Re: [PATCH 4/9] iio: adc: at91_adc: rework trigger definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/11/2020 17:02:30+0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 22:26:45 +0100
> Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Move the available trigger definition back in the driver to stop cluttering
> > the device tree. There is no functional change except that it actually
> > fixes the available triggers for at91sam9rl as it inherited the list from
> > at91sam9260 but actually has the triggers from at91sam9x5.
> 
> Is that a fix we might want to backport?  If not we should probably put a clear
> statement in here to avoid it getting picked up by the bot.
> 
> I'd argue it's to invasive a change to backport.
> 

Nobody ever complained about it so I don't think it is necessary to
backport. Anyway, the proper backportable fix would be to simply change
the device tree, that avoids the driver change which I also think is too
invasive. I'll include the DT change in v2.




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux