On 14/11/2020 17:02:30+0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 22:26:45 +0100 > Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Move the available trigger definition back in the driver to stop cluttering > > the device tree. There is no functional change except that it actually > > fixes the available triggers for at91sam9rl as it inherited the list from > > at91sam9260 but actually has the triggers from at91sam9x5. > > Is that a fix we might want to backport? If not we should probably put a clear > statement in here to avoid it getting picked up by the bot. > > I'd argue it's to invasive a change to backport. > Nobody ever complained about it so I don't think it is necessary to backport. Anyway, the proper backportable fix would be to simply change the device tree, that avoids the driver change which I also think is too invasive. I'll include the DT change in v2.
