On 11/13/20 5:48 PM, Georgi Djakov wrote: > On 11/12/20 16:09, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> >> This patchset adds interconnect API support for the Exynos SoC "samsung, >> exynos-bus" compatible devices, which already have their corresponding >> exynos-bus driver in the devfreq subsystem. Complementing the devfreq >> driver with an interconnect functionality allows to ensure the QoS >> requirements of devices accessing the system memory (e.g. video processing >> devices) are fulfilled and allows to avoid issues like the one discussed >> in thread [1]. >> >> This patch series adds implementation of the interconnect provider per each >> "samsung,exynos-bus" compatible DT node, with one interconnect node per >> provider. The interconnect code which was previously added as a part of >> the devfreq driver has been converted to a separate platform driver. >> In the devfreq a corresponding virtual child platform device is registered. >> Integration of devfreq and interconnect frameworks is achieved through >> the PM QoS API. >> >> A sample interconnect consumer for exynos-mixer is added in patch 5/5, >> it is currently added only for exynos4412 and allows to address the >> mixer DMA underrun error issues [1]. > > Good work Sylwester! Thank you and all the reviewers! What would be the merge > path for this patchset? Looks like there is no build dependency between patches. > Should i take just patches 2,3 or also patch 1? Chanwoo? Hi Georgi, If you take the patch 2,3, I'll apply patch 1,4 to devfreq.git. Hi Sylwester, First of all, thanks for your work to finish it for a long time. I'm very happy about finishing this work. It is very necessary feature for the QoS. Once again, thank for your work. -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi Samsung Electronics
