On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:35:36PM +0100, Christian Eggers wrote:
> static int ksz9477_ptp_enable(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, struct ptp_clock_request *req, int on)
> {
> - return -ENOTTY;
> + struct ksz_device *dev = container_of(ptp, struct ksz_device, ptp_caps);
> + int ret;
> +
> + switch (req->type) {
> + case PTP_CLK_REQ_PPS:
> + mutex_lock(&dev->ptp_mutex);
> + ret = ksz9477_ptp_enable_pps(dev, on);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->ptp_mutex);
> + return ret;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
Richard, do you think we can clarify the intended usage of PTP_CLK_REQ_PPS
in the documentation? It doesn't appear to be written anywhere that
PTP_ENABLE_PPS is supposed to enable event generation for the drivers/pps
subsystem. You would sort of have to know before you could find out...
