On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 01:31:02PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Steffen Trumtrar
> <s.trumtrar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 06:22:01PM -0500, tthayer@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Addition of the Altera SDRAM Controller bindings and device tree changes.
> >>
> >> v2: Changes to SoC SDRAM EDAC code.
> >>
> >> v3: Implement code suggestions for SDRAM EDAC code.
> >>
> >> v4: Remove syscon from SDRAM controller bindings.
> >>
> >> v5: No Change, bump version for consistency.
> >>
> >> v6: Only map the ctrlcfg register as syscon.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> .../bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram.txt | 11 +++++++++++
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi | 5 +++++
> >> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram.txt
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram.txt
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..5027026
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram.txt
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> >> +Altera SOCFPGA SDRAM Controller
> >> +
> >> +Required properties:
> >> +- compatible : "altr,sdr-ctl";
> >> +- reg : Should contain 1 register ranges(address and length)
> >> +
> >> +Example:
> >> + sdrctl@ffc25000 {
> >> + compatible = "altr,sdr-ctl";
> >> + reg = <0xffc25000 0x4>;
> >> + };
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> >> index 4676f25..310292e 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> >> @@ -682,6 +682,11 @@
> >> clocks = <&l4_sp_clk>;
> >> };
> >>
> >> + sdrctl@ffc25000 {
> >> + compatible = "altr,sdr-ctl", "syscon";
> >
> > Did you forget to add the syscon to the binding documentation?
> >
> Hi Steffen,
>
> I guess I'm confused about when to use syscon. In my last series, I
> was advised not to include syscon in the bindings but to use it in the
> device tree. I had been including it in the binding document until
> this patch.
>
Oh, aha. Well, then I'm confused, too. Let's wait for one of the DT
binding guys than.
Regards,
Steffen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
