Hi,
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:21:01PM +0800, Frank Lee wrote:
> From: Yangtao Li <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Sid should be an efuse type device accurately. And no one
> needs sid label, so delete it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> index dc238814013c..96543df5d890 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ mmc2: mmc@1c11000 {
> #size-cells = <0>;
> };
>
> - sid: eeprom@1c14000 {
> + efuse@1c14000 {
> compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-sid";
> reg = <0x1c14000 0x400>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
I agree with this on principle, but we should do it on all the SoCs at
once. Can you send another version doing so?
Thanks!
Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
