On 11/10/2020 2:13 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 11/10/20 2:12 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 07:31:08PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Provide an empty 'ports' container node with the correct #address-cells
>>> and #size-cells properties. This silences the following warning:
>>>
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-asus-rt-ac56u.dt.yaml:
>>> ethernet-switch@18007000: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
>>> 'ports' is a required property
>>> 'ethernet-ports' is a required property
>>> From schema:
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/b53.yaml
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi | 4 ++++
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi
>>> index 807580dd89f5..89993a8a6765 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi
>>> @@ -489,6 +489,10 @@ srab: ethernet-switch@18007000 {
>>> status = "disabled";
>>>
>>> /* ports are defined in board DTS */
>>> + ports {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> + };
>>
>> This look a bit 'lone wolf' here. Not sure how much time you intend to
>> spend on this, but FWIW, others prefer to declare all ports in the SoC
>> DTSI with status = "disabled", and just enable the ones used per-board,
>> and add labels and PHY handles also per-board. Example: fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
>> and fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts.
>
> That's a good suggestion, I could do that.
There is quite a bit of variation between designs and how the ports are
assigned and it would end up being quite verbose, so I will punt that
for now.
--
Florian
