On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 06:40:43PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > For the Armada 380 and Armada 385 SoCs, the common bindings for those > 2 SoCs, was forgotten. This patch add the documentation for the > marvell,aramda38x property. > > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > -- > Hi, > > This fix should be merged in 3.16. For 3.15 I am not sure as it is not > a regression. > > Changelog: > v1->v2 > > - Reformulate to make clear that we will need marvell,armada38x _and_ a > SoC specific string. For consistency I duplicated what we have done in > armada-370-xp.txt > > > Thanks, > Gregory > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/armada-38x.txt | 17 +++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/armada-38x.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/armada-38x.txt > index 11f2330a6554..fa08760046df 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/armada-38x.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/armada-38x.txt > @@ -6,5 +6,18 @@ following property: > > Required root node property: > > - - compatible: must contain either "marvell,armada380" or > - "marvell,armada385" depending on the variant of the SoC being used. > +compatible: must contain "marvell,armada38x" I agree with Sergei on this one. We generally avoid wildcards in compatible strings. Is there a use case where specifying one of the below wouldn't be sufficient? > + > +In addition, boards using the Marvell Armada 380 SoC shall have the > +following property: > + > +Required root node property: > + > +compatible: must contain "marvell,armada380" > + > +In addition, boards using the Marvell Armada 385 SoC shall have the > +following property: > + > +Required root node property: > + > +compatible: must contain "marvell,armada385" thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
