Hello This patch is a leftover, the correct one is the other one. Actually the only difference is using "Luton" instead of "luton" in the topic. Gregory Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Luton SoCs belongs to the same family as Ocelot. > > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mscc.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mscc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mscc.txt > index bc817e984628..cc93fd302553 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mscc.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mscc.txt > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Boards with a SoC of the Microsemi MIPS family shall have the following > properties: > > Required properties: > -- compatible: "mscc,ocelot" > +- compatible: "mscc,ocelot" or "mscc,luton" > > > * Other peripherals: > -- > 2.28.0 > -- Gregory Clement, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://bootlin.com
