Hi, On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 11:41:33PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote: > From: Ondrej Jirman <megous@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Pinephone has STK3311-X proximity sensor. Add support for it. > > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <megous@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi > index e595a8262920..9544d7658794 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi > @@ -160,6 +160,16 @@ lis3mdl: lis3mdl@1e { > vddio-supply = <®_dldo1>; > }; > > + /* Light/proximity sensor */ > + stk3311@48 { > + compatible = "sensortek,stk3311"; > + reg = <0x48>; > + interrupt-parent = <&pio>; > + interrupts = <1 0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; /* PB0 */ > + vdd-supply = <®_ldo_io0>; > + leda-supply = <®_dldo1>; > + }; > + The node names should be the class of the device, not the model. The other sensors here have a similar issue though, so I've applied it, but could you send a subsequent patch fixing this? Thanks! Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature