On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:33:40AM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon 02 Nov 20, 11:13, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 07:21:36PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > > Document the compatible strings for the SL631 Action Camera with IMX179. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@xxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml | 6 ++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > > > index afa00268c7db..0fa0c0b5d89f 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > > > @@ -754,6 +754,12 @@ properties: > > > - const: sinlinx,sina33 > > > - const: allwinner,sun8i-a33 > > > > > > + - description: SL631 Action Camera with IMX179 > > > + items: > > > + - const: unknown,sl631-imx179 > > > + - const: unknown,sl631 > > > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3 > > > + > > > > unknown is not a valid vendor (and you should explain why you picked > > that vendor name in the first place). > > Ah right, it's not in the vendor prefixes. The rationale is that there is no > indication of what the vendor might be on the PCB. Should I maybe use > allwinner here? You should mention it in the commit log for a start :) But yeah, we've used allwinner as a fallback for those cases so far. Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
