Hi,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:55:35AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> $subject - ARM: dts:
>
> On 06/18/2014 10:43 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > by providing phandles to rtc and wdt nodes, we can
> > let boards enable rtc and wdt as necessary.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi
> > index 49fa596..e3830d4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi
> > @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@
> > ti,hwmods = "counter_32k";
> > };
> >
> > - rtc@44e3e000 {
> > + rtc: rtc@44e3e000 {
> > compatible = "ti,am4372-rtc","ti,da830-rtc";
> > reg = <0x44e3e000 0x1000>;
> > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 75 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> > @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> > - wdt@44e35000 {
> > + wdt: wdt@44e35000 {
> > compatible = "ti,am4372-wdt","ti,omap3-wdt";
> > reg = <0x44e35000 0x1000>;
> > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 91 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >
> we might want to fix up any other similar nodes in dtsi as well, no?
>
> examples:
> cpu@0
and why would you want boards to mess with the cpu node ?
> dispc@4832a400
perhaps
> Might also be nice to have Fixes: to point out which commit was being
> fixed, no?
no other board enables those, so I wouldn't consider it a fix.
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
