On 2020-10-26 08:01, Biwen Li wrote:
From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@xxxxxxx>
Add an new IRQ chip declaration for LS1043A and LS1088A
- compatible "fsl,ls1043a-extirq" for LS1043A, LS1046A
- compatible "fsl,ls1088a-extirq" for LS1088A, LS208xA, LX216xA
Three things:
- This commit message doesn't describe the bit_reverse change
- Please add a cover letter
- Sending the same series again after 4 days is not OK, specially when
the initial one was during the merge window.
Thanks,
M.
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Biwen Li <biwen.li@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
index 4d1179fed77c..564e6de0bd8e 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+// Copyright 2019-2020 NXP
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "irq-ls-extirq: " fmt
@@ -183,6 +184,9 @@ ls_extirq_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct
device_node *parent)
priv->bit_reverse = (revcr != 0);
}
+ if (of_device_is_compatible(node, "fsl,ls1043a-extirq"))
+ priv->bit_reverse = true;
+
domain = irq_domain_add_hierarchy(parent_domain, 0, priv->nirq, node,
&extirq_domain_ops, priv);
if (!domain)
@@ -195,3 +199,5 @@ ls_extirq_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct
device_node *parent)
}
IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ls1021a_extirq, "fsl,ls1021a-extirq",
ls_extirq_of_init);
+IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ls1043a_extirq, "fsl,ls1043a-extirq",
ls_extirq_of_init);
+IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ls1088a_extirq, "fsl,ls1088a-extirq",
ls_extirq_of_init);
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
