On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:32:43PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 01:11:40PM +0200, Christian Eggers wrote: > > > it seems that "moving" the timestamp back to the tail tag on TX is not > > required anymore. Keeping the RX timestamp simply in the correction > > field (negative value), works fine now. So this halves the effort in > > the tag_ksz driver. > > Ok, this makes sense. > Depending on what Richard responds, it now looks like the cleanest > approach would be to move your implementation that is currently in > ksz9477_update_ptp_correction_field() into a generic function called +1
