On 22/10/20 10:17AM, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
> Hi Pratyush,
>
> On 21/10/2020 11:17 pm, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 21/10/20 10:55AM, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
> > > From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > On Intel Lightning Mountain(LGM) SoCs QSPI controller do not use
> > > Direct Access Controller(DAC).
> > >
> > > This patch adds a quirk to disable the Direct Access Controller
> > > for data transfer instead it uses indirect data transfer.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> > > index d7b10c46fa70..3d017b484114 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> > > @@ -1106,6 +1106,13 @@ static void cqspi_controller_init(struct cqspi_st *cqspi)
> > > reg |= CQSPI_REG_CONFIG_ENB_DIR_ACC_CTRL;
> > > writel(reg, cqspi->iobase + CQSPI_REG_CONFIG);
> > > + /* Disable direct access controller */
> > > + if (!cqspi->use_direct_mode) {
> > > + reg = readl(cqspi->iobase + CQSPI_REG_CONFIG);
> > > + reg &= ~CQSPI_REG_CONFIG_ENB_DIR_ACC_CTRL;
> > > + writel(reg, cqspi->iobase + CQSPI_REG_CONFIG);
> > > + }
> > > +
> >
> > Do you really need to disable the DAC controller? cqspi_read() and
> > cqspi_write() already check for cqspi->use_direct_mode and avoid using
> > direct mode if it is false. While I don't think it would do any harm I'm
> > curious what prompted you to do this instead of just setting the quirk
> > like cdns_qspi does.
> >
> > Anyway, if you do insist on doing it, it does not make any sense to set
> > a bit and then unset it immediately after. The datasheet I have says
> > this bit resets to 1 so the block above the code you added should be
> > removed.
> Thank you for your review comments..
> yes, we need this patch to disable DAC for our SoC to avoid any conflicts in
> future as well since Intel LGM SoC doesn't support DAC at all.
I'm not sure you got my point here. I understand that LGM SoCs don't
support DAC. I'm not arguing if this _patch_ is needed. I'm arguing if
this _hunk_ is needed. Does DAC mode need to be explicitly disabled
here? Why will the check in cqspi_read() and cqspi_write() not be
enough?
My other point is that if you absolutely need to disable DAC mode, then
instead of the code you have added, it would make more sense to do
something like below in cqspi_controller_init(). Because the bit resets
to 1 so the block of code to enable it is useless [0].
--- 8< ---
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
index d7ad8b198a11..d2c5d448a944 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
@@ -2156,10 +2156,12 @@ static void cqspi_controller_init(struct cqspi_st *cqspi)
writel(cqspi->fifo_depth * cqspi->fifo_width / 8,
cqspi->iobase + CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTWRWATERMARK);
- /* Enable Direct Access Controller */
- reg = readl(cqspi->iobase + CQSPI_REG_CONFIG);
- reg |= CQSPI_REG_CONFIG_ENB_DIR_ACC_CTRL;
- writel(reg, cqspi->iobase + CQSPI_REG_CONFIG);
+ /* Disable Direct Access Controller */
+ if (!cqspi->use_dac_mode) {
+ reg = readl(cqspi->iobase + CQSPI_REG_CONFIG);
+ reg &= ~CQSPI_REG_CONFIG_ENB_DIR_ACC_CTRL;
+ writel(reg, cqspi->iobase + CQSPI_REG_CONFIG);
+ }
cqspi_controller_enable(cqspi, 1);
}
--- >8 ---
Disclaimer: not tested at all.
[0] Git blames Vignesh for that block of code added in a27f2eaf2b27.
Vignesh, was this simply an oversight or was there any real reason to
set the bit?
> Regards
> Vadivel
> >
> > > cqspi_controller_enable(cqspi, 1);
> > > }
> > > @@ -1388,6 +1395,10 @@ static const struct cqspi_driver_platdata am654_ospi = {
> > > .quirks = CQSPI_NEEDS_WR_DELAY,
> > > };
> > > +static const struct cqspi_driver_platdata intel_lgm_qspi = {
> > > + .quirks = CQSPI_DISABLE_DAC_MODE,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > static const struct of_device_id cqspi_dt_ids[] = {
> > > {
> > > .compatible = "cdns,qspi-nor",
> > > @@ -1403,6 +1414,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id cqspi_dt_ids[] = {
> > > },
> > > {
> > > .compatible = "intel,lgm-qspi",
> > > + .data = &intel_lgm_qspi,
> > > },
> > > { /* end of table */ }
> > > };
> >
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments India
