On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 6:52 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On Mon, 2020-10-12 at 10:25 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:12 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne > > <nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The function provides the CPU physical address addressable by the most > > > constrained bus in the system. It might be useful in order to > > > dynamically set up memory zones during boot. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/of/address.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > include/linux/of.h | 7 +++++++ > > > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c > > > index eb9ab4f1e80b..755e97b65096 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/of/address.c > > > +++ b/drivers/of/address.c > > > @@ -1024,6 +1024,40 @@ int of_dma_get_range(struct device_node *np, const struct bus_dma_region **map) > > > } > > > #endif /* CONFIG_HAS_DMA */ > > > > > > +/** > > > + * of_dma_safe_phys_limit - Get system wide DMA safe address space > > > + * > > > + * Gets the CPU physical address limit for safe DMA addressing system wide by > > > + * searching for the most constraining dma-range. Otherwise it returns ~0ULL. > > > + */ > > > +u64 __init of_dma_safe_phys_limit(void) > > > +{ > > > + struct device_node *np = NULL; > > > + struct of_range_parser parser; > > > + const __be32 *ranges = NULL; > > > + u64 phys_dma_limit = ~0ULL; > > > + struct of_range range; > > > + int len; > > > + > > > + for_each_of_allnodes(np) { > > > + dma_addr_t cpu_end = 0; > > > + > > > + ranges = of_get_property(np, "dma-ranges", &len); > > > + if (!ranges || !len) > > > + continue; > > > + > > > + of_dma_range_parser_init(&parser, np); > > > + for_each_of_range(&parser, &range) > > > + if (range.cpu_addr + range.size > cpu_end) > > > + cpu_end = range.cpu_addr + range.size; > > > > This doesn't work if you have more than one level of dma-ranges. The > > address has to be translated first. It should be okay to do that on > > the start or end address (if not, your DT is broken). > > for_each_of_range() calls of_pci_range_parser_one() which utimately populates > range.cpu_addr with of_translate_dma_address() results. Isn't that good enough? Indeed. I guess I was remembering the cases not using for_each_of_range which forgot to do that... Rob