Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

sorry, I still found a problem that I want to have addressed. I'll point
out a few minor things en passant.

But after that I really have a good feeling and like the driver now.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 02:14:12AM +0800, vijayakannan.ayyathurai@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> +static void keembay_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +				  struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> +	struct keembay_pwm *priv = to_keembay_pwm_dev(chip);
> +	unsigned long long pwm_h_count, pwm_l_count;
> +	unsigned long clk_rate;
> +	u32 buff;
> +
> +	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
> +
> +	/* Read channel enabled status */
> +	buff = readl(priv->base + KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET(pwm->hwpwm));
> +	if (buff & KMB_PWM_EN_BIT)
> +		state->enabled = true;
> +	else
> +		state->enabled = false;
> +
> +	/* Read period and duty cycle */
> +	buff = readl(priv->base + KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW_OFFSET(pwm->hwpwm));
> +	pwm_l_count = FIELD_GET(KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK, buff) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> +	pwm_h_count = FIELD_GET(KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK, buff) * NSEC_PER_SEC;

<minor nit>: The variable names are not optimal. I'd use "highlow"
instead of "buff". pwm_l_count would be appropriate for
FIELD_GET(KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK, buff); when multiplied with NSEC_PER_SEC
it's not really matching. Maybe just use "low"?! (and "high" instead of
pwm_h_count)

> +	state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(pwm_h_count, clk_rate);
> +	state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(pwm_h_count + pwm_l_count, clk_rate);

state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL; (That's the important bit here.)

> +}
> +
> +static int keembay_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +			     const struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> +	struct keembay_pwm *priv = to_keembay_pwm_dev(chip);
> +	struct pwm_state current_state;
> +	u16 pwm_h_count, pwm_l_count;
> +	unsigned long long div;
> +	unsigned long clk_rate;
> +	u32 pwm_count = 0;
> +
> +	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> +		return -ENOSYS;
> +
> +	keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_LEADIN_MASK, 0,
> +				KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET(pwm->hwpwm));

A comment describing the effect of this register would be great.

> +	keembay_pwm_get_state(chip, pwm, &current_state);
> +
> +	if (!state->enabled) {
> +		if (current_state.enabled)
> +			keembay_pwm_disable(priv, pwm->hwpwm);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> [...]

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux