Can you check your get_maintainers script invocation? Not sure why arm64 maintainers are Cced on a clk patch. Quoting Varadarajan Narayanan (2020-09-27 22:15:34) > Add programming sequence support for managing the Stromer > PLLs. > > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <varada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h | 5 ++ > 2 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c > index 26139ef..ce3257f 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c > @@ -116,6 +116,19 @@ const u8 clk_alpha_pll_regs[][PLL_OFF_MAX_REGS] = { > [PLL_OFF_OPMODE] = 0x38, > [PLL_OFF_ALPHA_VAL] = 0x40, > }, > + Nitpick: Drop this newline. > + [CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_STROMER] = { > + [PLL_OFF_L_VAL] = 0x08, > + [PLL_OFF_ALPHA_VAL] = 0x10, > + [PLL_OFF_ALPHA_VAL_U] = 0x14, > + [PLL_OFF_USER_CTL] = 0x18, > + [PLL_OFF_USER_CTL_U] = 0x1c, > + [PLL_OFF_CONFIG_CTL] = 0x20, > + [PLL_OFF_CONFIG_CTL_U] = 0xff, > + [PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL] = 0x30, > + [PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL_U] = 0x34, > + [PLL_OFF_STATUS] = 0x28, > + }, > }; > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_alpha_pll_regs); > > @@ -127,6 +140,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_alpha_pll_regs); > #define ALPHA_BITWIDTH 32U > #define ALPHA_SHIFT(w) min(w, ALPHA_BITWIDTH) > > +#define PLL_STATUS_REG_SHIFT 8 This should have an ALPHA_ prefix. > + > #define PLL_HUAYRA_M_WIDTH 8 > #define PLL_HUAYRA_M_SHIFT 8 > #define PLL_HUAYRA_M_MASK 0xff > @@ -240,14 +255,143 @@ void clk_alpha_pll_configure(struct clk_alpha_pll *pll, struct regmap *regmap, > mask |= config->pre_div_mask; > mask |= config->post_div_mask; > mask |= config->vco_mask; > + mask |= config->alpha_en_mask; > + mask |= config->alpha_mode_mask; > > regmap_update_bits(regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), mask, val); > > + /* Stromer APSS PLL does not enable LOCK_DET by default, so enable it */ > + val_u = config->status_reg_val << PLL_STATUS_REG_SHIFT; > + val_u |= config->lock_det; > + > + mask_u = config->status_reg_mask; > + mask_u |= config->lock_det; > + > + if (val_u != 0) if (val_u) is more canonical. > + regmap_update_bits(regmap, PLL_USER_CTL_U(pll), mask_u, val_u); > + > + if (config->test_ctl_val != 0) Same comment > + regmap_write(regmap, PLL_TEST_CTL(pll), config->test_ctl_val); > + > + if (config->test_ctl_hi_val != 0) Same comment > + regmap_write(regmap, PLL_TEST_CTL_U(pll), config->test_ctl_hi_val); > + > if (pll->flags & SUPPORTS_FSM_MODE) > qcom_pll_set_fsm_mode(regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), 6, 0); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_alpha_pll_configure); > > +static unsigned long > +alpha_pll_stromer_calc_rate(u64 prate, u32 l, u64 a) > +{ > + return (prate * l) + ((prate * a) >> ALPHA_REG_BITWIDTH); Is this not already in this file? Why can't we use alpha_pll_calc_rate()? > +} > + > +static unsigned long > +alpha_pll_stromer_round_rate(unsigned long rate, unsigned long prate, u32 *l, u64 *a) > +{ > + u64 remainder; > + u64 quotient; > + > + quotient = rate; > + remainder = do_div(quotient, prate); > + *l = quotient; > + > + if (!remainder) { > + *a = 0; > + return rate; > + } > + > + quotient = remainder << ALPHA_REG_BITWIDTH; > + > + remainder = do_div(quotient, prate); > + > + if (remainder) > + quotient++; > + > + *a = quotient; > + return alpha_pll_stromer_calc_rate(prate, *l, *a); > +} > + > +static unsigned long > +clk_alpha_pll_stromer_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long parent_rate) > +{ > + u32 l, low, high, ctl; > + u64 a = 0, prate = parent_rate; > + struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw); > + > + regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_L_VAL(pll), &l); > + > + regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), &ctl); > + if (ctl & PLL_ALPHA_EN) { > + regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL(pll), &low); > + regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL_U(pll), > + &high); > + a = (u64)high << ALPHA_BITWIDTH | low; > + } > + > + return alpha_pll_stromer_calc_rate(prate, l, a); > +} > + > +static int clk_alpha_pll_stromer_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > + struct clk_rate_request *req) > +{ > + unsigned long rate = req->rate; > + u32 l; > + u64 a; > + > + rate = alpha_pll_stromer_round_rate(rate, req->best_parent_rate, &l, &a); Why assign to rate if nobody is going to look at it? Should probably be set to req->rate instead? > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int clk_alpha_pll_stromer_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > + unsigned long prate) > +{ > + struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw); > + u32 l; > + int ret; > + u64 a; > + > + rate = alpha_pll_stromer_round_rate(rate, prate, &l, &a); > + > + /* Write desired values to registers */ Please drop this useless comment. > + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_L_VAL(pll), l); > + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL(pll), a); > + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL_U(pll), > + a >> ALPHA_BITWIDTH); > + > + regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), > + PLL_ALPHA_EN, PLL_ALPHA_EN); > + > + if (!clk_hw_is_enabled(hw)) > + return 0; > + > + /* Stromer PLL supports Dynamic programming. The /* goes on a line by itself. > + * It allows the PLL frequency to be changed on-the-fly without first > + * execution of a shutdown procedure followed by a bring up procedure. > + */ Cool feature. Maybe that can go into the header file though? > + > + regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), PLL_UPDATE, > + PLL_UPDATE); > + /* Make sure PLL_UPDATE request goes through */ > + mb(); regmap APIs already have memory barriers so this isn't needed? > + > + /* Wait for PLL_UPDATE to be cleared */ I think the code already says this so we can just drop this comment. > + ret = wait_for_pll_update(pll); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + /* Wait 11or more PLL clk_ref ticks[to be explored more on wait] */ > + Is this a TODO? > + /* Poll LOCK_DET for one */ I think the code already says this so we can just drop this comment. > + ret = wait_for_pll_enable_lock(pll); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int clk_alpha_pll_hwfsm_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) > { > int ret;