On 09-10-20, 16:28, Nicola Mazzucato wrote: > @Viresh > I am sorry I misread your reply earlier thus I did not pay attention on that > property. > And yes, it is exactly as how you have described :) > In the case 1 (different opps, different clk) and case 2 (same opps, different > clk) we provide v/f points. In case 3, we add 'opp-shared' property in opp table > to tell that the cpus with this opp table share a clock line. > > Here are my thoughts on this 3rd case: > - the information of 'share the same clock line' comes correctly from DT as it's > purely a hw description. The same applies for cpu-perf-dependencies. > - because the opp table can come from any firmware, we won't have any opp table > in DT, thus we won't be able to take advantage of 'opp-shared' I am afraid. I wonder if we should use an empty OPP table just for parsing this information. -- viresh
