Hi Rob, Many thanks for your comments, some questions below. On 7/10/20 17:11, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:29:51AM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote: >> Convert the soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt binding document to json-schema >> and move to the power bindings directory. >> >> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> Changes in v3: >> - Fixed tab errors found by bot >> >> Changes in v2: >> - Fixed a warning that says that 'syscon' should not be used alone. >> - Use patternProperties to define a new level for power-domains. >> - Add const values for power-domain-cells, address-cells, etc. >> >> .../power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml | 207 ++++++++++++++++++ >> .../bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt | 136 ------------ >> 2 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml >> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..b23ea37e2a08 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml >> @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) >> +%YAML 1.2 >> +--- >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml# >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >> + >> +title: Rockchip Power Domains >> + >> +maintainers: >> + - Caesar Wang <wxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> + - Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> >> + >> +description: | >> + Rockchip processors include support for multiple power domains which can be >> + powered up/down by software based on different application scenes to save power. >> + >> + Power domains contained within power-controller node are generic power domain >> + providers documented in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml. >> + >> + IP cores belonging to a power domain should contain a 'power-domains' >> + property that is a phandle for the power domain node representing the domain. >> + >> +properties: >> + $nodename: >> + const: power-controller >> + >> + compatible: >> + enum: >> + - rockchip,px30-power-controller >> + - rockchip,rk3036-power-controller >> + - rockchip,rk3066-power-controller >> + - rockchip,rk3128-power-controller >> + - rockchip,rk3188-power-controller >> + - rockchip,rk3228-power-controller >> + - rockchip,rk3288-power-controller >> + - rockchip,rk3328-power-controller >> + - rockchip,rk3366-power-controller >> + - rockchip,rk3368-power-controller >> + - rockchip,rk3399-power-controller >> + >> + '#power-domain-cells': >> + const: 1 >> + >> + '#address-cells': >> + const: 1 >> + >> + '#size-cells': >> + const: 0 >> + >> +patternProperties: >> + "^power-domain@[0-9]+$": > > unit-addresses are hex. > As explained in the description of 'reg' is more a power domain index than a hexadecimal address. Same as done in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/fsl,imx-gpcv2.yaml Use hex pattern will give a lot of errors, i.e 'pd_edp@25' and many others will not match the regexes '^power-domain@[0-9a-f]+$' Is the hex notation a must here? In that case, I assume I should change all the power/rk3*power.h includes to use that notation. >> + type: object >> + description: | >> + Represents the power domains within the power controller node as documented >> + in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml. >> + >> + properties: >> + >> + '#power-domain-cells': >> + description: >> + Must be 0 for nodes representing a single PM domain and 1 for nodes >> + providing multiple PM domains. >> + >> + '#address-cells': >> + const: 1 >> + >> + '#size-cells': >> + const: 0 >> + >> + reg: >> + description: | >> + Power domain index. Valid values are defined in: >> + "include/dt-bindings/power/px30-power.h" - for PX30 type power domain. >> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3036-power.h" - for RK3036 type power domain. >> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3066-power.h" - for RK3066 type power domain. >> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3128-power.h" - for RK3128 type power domain. >> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3188-power.h" - for RK3188 type power domain. >> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3228-power.h" - for RK3228 type power domain. >> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3288-power.h" - for RK3288 type power domain. >> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3328-power.h" - for RK3328 type power domain. >> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3366-power.h" - for RK3366 type power domain. >> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h" - for RK3368 type power domain. >> + "include/dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h" - for RK3399 type power domain. >> + maxItems: 1 > > Range of values? > >> + >> + clocks: >> + description: | >> + A number of phandles to clocks that need to be enabled while power domain >> + switches state. > > Can you at least put a range of how many clocks? > minItems could be 0, but from the datasheet, I am not sure if I am able to define a maxItems, I think I can do two things, or define a maxItems based on current definitions (with the risk that if a new SoC is supported we should change that number) or use a finger in the air "safe" value. Should any of these solutions be acceptable for you? >> + >> + pm_qos: >> + description: | >> + A number of phandles to qos blocks which need to be saved and restored >> + while power domain switches state. > > And here. > The same as clocks here. >> + >> + required: >> + - reg > > additionalProperties: false > > Which in turn means the nested power domains will throw an error, so you > can do: > > patternProperties: > "^power-domain@[0-9a-f]+$": > $ref: '#/patternProperties/^power-domain@[0-9a-f]+$' > >> + >> +required: >> + - compatible >> + - '#power-domain-cells' >> + >> +additionalProperties: false >> + >> +examples: >> + - | >> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h> >> + #include <dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h> >> + >> + soc { >> + #address-cells = <2>; >> + #size-cells = <2>; >> + >> + qos_hdcp: qos@ffa90000 { >> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-qos","syscon"; > > space ^ > >> + reg = <0x0 0xffa90000 0x0 0x20>; >> + }; >> + >> + qos_iep: qos@ffa98000 { >> + compatible = "rk3399-qos","syscon"; >> + reg = <0x0 0xffa98000 0x0 0x20>; >> + }; >> + >> + qos_rga_r: qos@ffab0000 { >> + compatible = "rk3399-qos","syscon"; >> + reg = <0x0 0xffab0000 0x0 0x20>; >> + }; >> + >> + qos_rga_w: qos@ffab0080 { >> + compatible = "rk3399-qos","syscon"; >> + reg = <0x0 0xffab0080 0x0 0x20>; >> + }; >> + >> + qos_video_m0: qos@ffab8000 { >> + compatible = "rk3399-qos","syscon"; >> + reg = <0x0 0xffab8000 0x0 0x20>; >> + }; >> + >> + qos_video_m1_r: qos@ffac0000 { >> + compatible = "rk3399-qos","syscon"; >> + reg = <0x0 0xffac0000 0x0 0x20>; >> + }; >> + >> + qos_video_m1_w: qos@ffac0080 { >> + compatible = "rk3399-qos","syscon"; >> + reg = <0x0 0xffac0080 0x0 0x20>; >> + }; >> + >> + power-management@ff310000 { >> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-pmu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"; >> + reg = <0x0 0xff310000 0x0 0x1000>; >> + >> + power-controller { >> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-power-controller"; >> + #power-domain-cells = <1>; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + >> + /* These power domains are grouped by VD_CENTER */ >> + power-domain@RK3399_PD_IEP { >> + reg = <RK3399_PD_IEP>; >> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_IEP>, >> + <&cru HCLK_IEP>; >> + pm_qos = <&qos_iep>; >> + #power-domain-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + power-domain@RK3399_PD_RGA { >> + reg = <RK3399_PD_RGA>; >> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_RGA>, >> + <&cru HCLK_RGA>; >> + pm_qos = <&qos_rga_r>, >> + <&qos_rga_w>; >> + #power-domain-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + power-domain@RK3399_PD_VCODEC { >> + reg = <RK3399_PD_VCODEC>; >> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_VCODEC>, >> + <&cru HCLK_VCODEC>; >> + pm_qos = <&qos_video_m0>; >> + #power-domain-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + power-domain@RK3399_PD_VDU { >> + reg = <RK3399_PD_VDU>; >> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_VDU>, >> + <&cru HCLK_VDU>; >> + pm_qos = <&qos_video_m1_r>, >> + <&qos_video_m1_w>; >> + #power-domain-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + power-domain@RK3399_PD_VIO { >> + reg = <RK3399_PD_VIO>; >> + #power-domain-cells = <1>; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + >> + power-domain@RK3399_PD_HDCP { >> + reg = <RK3399_PD_HDCP>; >> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_HDCP>, >> + <&cru HCLK_HDCP>, >> + <&cru PCLK_HDCP>; >> + pm_qos = <&qos_hdcp>; >> + #power-domain-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + }; >> + }; >> + }; >> + };