Hi Nishanth, On 02/10/20 6:19 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 10:14-20201002, Faiz Abbas wrote: >> Hi Nishanth, >> >> On 02/10/20 12:43 am, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> On 00:35-20201002, Faiz Abbas wrote: >>>> The following patches add support for UHS modes for TI's j721e and j7200 >>>> boards. >>>> >>>> Patches 1-3 add support for gpios to j7200-evm >>>> >>>> Patches 4-6 add support for voltage regulators for required by the >>>> SD card in both devices as well as enable UHS modes at 1.8V >>>> >>>> Patches 5-6 add some required configs to the arm64 defconfig. >>>> >>>> This series depends on driver patches adding tuning support here: >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200923105206.7988-1-faiz_abbas@xxxxxx/ >>>> >>>> Faiz Abbas (8): >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-main: Add gpio nodes in main domain >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: Add gpio nodes in wakeup domain >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-common-proc-board: Disable unused gpio >>>> modules >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-main: Add output tap delay values >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-common-proc-board: Add support SD card UHS >>>> modes >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-common-proc-board: Add support SD card UHS >>>> modes >>> >>> Split these up please! >> >> Into SD card UHS and gpio series? >> >>>> arm64: defconfig: Enable OMAP I2C driver >>>> arm64: defconfig: Enable DAVINCI_GPIO driver >>>> >>> >>> defconfig patches can be posted independent of dts patches, they go to >>> different branches. >> >> I was trying to follow Arnd's advice here: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAK8P3a1JpCCCV-CVQj3+eMfWF+=4AuHPpv390Tyj2pKn63_ZVg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ >> >> He says that defconfig patches can be sent at the same time as dts updates and maintainers can send those >> as separate pull requests. > > BTW, [1] your patches 7/8 and 8/8 never hit the mailing list, So, I am > commenting on the defconfig patches without actually seeing the patches, > and solely based on $subject in the cover letter. This is weird. They are there in my patches/ folder and I always do a "git send-email patches/* ..." Not sure why they didn't get sent. My last send-email command does have all the patches being sent: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/VNWsrMcBZd/ > > The reason for my comment was that I think defconfig series could go > independent of the remaining series into 5.10, since they are not > related specifically to this series, they are probably needed even for > am654 and j721e nodes that already exist and was a miss that we didn't > enable. Tying that to this specific series didn't make sense to me. You're right that they are not tied to the series. > > But either way, we are way past rc7. I don't have enough time for > these patches to bake in -next to make it to 5.10 window. So, lets try > reposting this after rc1 tag is done so that I can send the defconfig > (separately for 5.10 window) and the dts staged towards 5.11 (and no, > I don't consider the dts patches as fixes - they are enabling the next > level of functionality). > Ok. I'll send only the defconfig patches in a new series and repost v2 of this at rc1. Thanks, Fai
