Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] leds: pwm: Remove platform_data support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > > +__attribute__((nonnull))
> > > 
> > >  static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv,
> > >  
> > >  		       struct led_pwm *led, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > >  
> > >  {
> > 
> > This normally goes elsewhere -- right? I'd expect:
> > 
> > 
> >   static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv,
> >   		       struct led_pwm *led, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > 	  __attribute__((nonnull))
> 
> I found both variants in kernel code.  I can live with both variants and have 
> no strong preference.
> 
> My initial intention to add it was to get a compiler warning in case someone 
> does not pass a fwnode here, e.g. when using that old platform_data approach 
> (which is supposed to be removed with this patch).  You might call it a self 
> check on my own changes.  I can also drop that attribute if you don't want 
> that kind of stuff in linux-leds.

I'm okay with it at the second place :-).

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux