On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:43:03AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:43:51PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > This is a *huge* patch series which is a bit unweildy to review > > (especially given the other 10+ patch series you sent at the same time), > Yeah, sorry about the bulky series. If most of the changes have been more > complicated than that, less inter-dependent and less directed to having the code > prepared for the main alterations I would have definitely split them up in > different series. But the biggest part of the patchset is just a preparation > before adding the mem-ops, poll-based transfers and Baikal-T1 SPI support. So > having them submitted without the main part of the patchset would be just weird. One option with things like this is to just not send everything at once - even when split into multiple series it's a huge bulk of patches in an inbox. Unless the patches are obviously from their subjects repetitive people probably aren't getting far enough in to look at the actual patches or even their sizes before deciding it looks like a lot of work and putting things off for later. > I see you have already merged in the first nine patches. So would you like me > to split the rest of them up into two series or it would be ok to resend (if > required) them as one series seeing it's not that bulky anymore? Not all of the first 9, IIRC I skipped one I had comments on. If they can be split that would probably be helpful, if there are dependencies then it's not going to buy too much.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
