On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 15:14 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:22 PM Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Try to list all the power domains of under power controller
> > node to show the dependency between each power domain directly
> > instead of filling the dependency in scp_soc_data.
> > And could be more clearly to group subsys clocks into power domain
> > sub node to introduce subsys clocks of bus protection in next patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> [snip]
> > +static int traverse_scp(struct platform_device *pdev, struct scp *scp,
> > + const struct scp_domain_data *scp_domain_data)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > + struct device_node *sub;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp->dep_links);
> > +
> > + for_each_available_child_of_node(np, sub) {
> > + ret = scpsys_get_domain(pdev, scp, sub, scp_domain_data);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to handle node %pOFn: %d\n", sub, ret);
>
> minor comment: this error should not be printed if ret ==
> -EPROBE_DEFER (use the new dev_err_probe?)
>
You're right! I'll use dev_err_probe() instead if anyone is interested
in this series. Thank you!
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +err:
> > + of_node_put(sub);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> [snip]
