Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: correct interrupt flags in examples

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:46:57AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> > GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
> > These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
> > have the same meaning:
> > 1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> > 2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW  = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> > 
> > Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
> > logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
> >   ACTIVE_LOW => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # for BD70528
> > Acked-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> # for gateworks-gsc.yaml
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > 1. Add acks
> 
> FYI, this should not bump the patch version.

Yes, that was my mistake. I kept this one with multiple other similar
patches and was updating all of them.... but I sent each group
independently at the end so this one did not receive any updates
actually.

Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux