Hei hei,
Am Dienstag, 22. September 2020, 17:57:47 CEST schrieb Rob Herring:
> Use generic node names:
>
> led-controller {
>
> > + compatible = "pwm-leds";
> > +
> > + led-1 {
> > + label = "omap4::keypad";
> > + pwms = <&twl_pwm 0 7812500>;
> > + max-brightness = <127>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + led-2 {
> > + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
> > + function = LED_FUNCTION_CHARGING;
> > + pwms = <&twl_pwmled 0 7812500>;
> > + max-brightness = <255>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > +...
This is clear for the "one led-controller" case. However, when trying to fix
those node names in existing .dts files, I wondered how those should be named
for multiple, different led-controllers, e.g. one using "pwm-leds" and another
one using "gpio-leds"?
See arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-kizbox3-hs.dts for example, the nodes are called
"pwm_leds" and "leds" currently. If both were part of a .dtsi and both named
the same, you could not overwrite/complement those in a .dts file including
that .dtsi due to a name conflict.
Just append a numerical index like this?
led-controller-1 {
…
};
led-controller-2 {
…
};
Greets
Alex
