RE: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add include/dt-bindings/leds/ to linux-leds list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > +F:   include/dt-bindings/leds/ 
> >  F:   include/linux/leds.h 
> I'd not say this is right. I'm not sure what the docs says, but I 
> don't commit dt changes without ack from Rob. With yaml stuff, I'm 
> even less confident doing so. 
> So I'd say Rob maintains this. 

https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/leds/leds-class.rst:

"
[...]
If required color or function is missing, please submit a patch
to linux-leds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
[...]
"

This was the only thing pointing me to the linux-leds list when I submitted my patches for LED_FUNCTION_RSSI etc. last week.
I only found it when I had already submitted to Rob and devicetree@ beforehand. However, all of the discussion actually took place at linux-leds@ after I resent there as well.

I do not care who merges this or whom I should send this to, but I think get_maintainers.sh should point me to the correct list where proposed changes are actually discussed (which happened on the linux-leds list).

Best

Adrian

Attachment: openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux