On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:26:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Document all ARMv5, ARMv6 and ARMv7 i.MX compatibles to fix dtbs_check > warnings like: > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-colibri-eval-v3.dt.yaml: pwm@2080000: compatible:0: > 'fsl,imx6q-pwm' is not one of ['fsl,imx8mm-pwm', 'fsl,imx8mn-pwm', 'fsl,imx8mp-pwm', 'fsl,imx8mq-pwm'] > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml > index 473863eb67e5..379d693889f6 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml > @@ -25,6 +25,17 @@ properties: > - fsl,imx27-pwm > - items: > - enum: > + - fsl,imx25-pwm The driver actually used fsl,imx27-pwm to bind ... Also since v5.1-rc1~38^2~17 the driver is split into pwm-imx27 and pwm-imx1. So maybe this file should be renamed to fsl,imx27-pwm.yaml? (And we need a volunteer to write fsl,imx1-pwm.yaml.) > + - fsl,imx31-pwm > + - fsl,imx50-pwm > + - fsl,imx51-pwm > + - fsl,imx53-pwm > + - fsl,imx6q-pwm > + - fsl,imx6sl-pwm > + - fsl,imx6sll-pwm > + - fsl,imx6sx-pwm > + - fsl,imx6ul-pwm > + - fsl,imx7d-pwm > - fsl,imx8mm-pwm > - fsl,imx8mn-pwm > - fsl,imx8mp-pwm Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
