Hi Rob, Rafael, Viresh, Daniel and Sudeep,
I am proposing the addition of performance dependencies in cpufreq core
and one if its drivers (the implementation/approach is RFC).
This is to support systems where exposed cpu performance controls are more
fine-grained that the platform's ability to scale cpus independently.
In this V2 posting of the proposed dt-binding to support this, I have
included an outline of how this information can be stored and passed onto
relevant OSPM frameworks.
Please see each patch for detailed information.
[v2]
* Fix errors when running make dt_binding_check
* Improve commit message description for the dt-binding
* Add RFC for implementation in cpufreq-core and one of its
drivers.
Nicola Mazzucato (2):
dt-bindings: arm: Add devicetree binding for
cpu-performance-dependencies
[RFC] CPUFreq: Add support for cpu-perf-dependencies
.../bindings/arm/cpu-perf-dependencies.yaml | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpu-perf-dependencies.yaml
--
2.27.0
