On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 06/11/2014 08:14 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > +static void mtk_clkevt_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode, > > > + struct clock_event_device *clk) > > > +{ > > > + struct mtk_clock_event_device *evt = to_mtk_clk(clk); > > > + > > > + mtk_clkevt_time_stop(evt, GPT_CLK_EVT); > > > + > > > + switch (mode) { > > > + case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC: > > > + mtk_clkevt_time_setup(evt, evt->ticks_per_jiffy, GPT_CLK_EVT); > > > + mtk_clkevt_time_start(evt, true, GPT_CLK_EVT); > > > + break; > > > + case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT: > > > + mtk_clkevt_time_start(evt, false, GPT_CLK_EVT); > > > > Why start the timer here? The code will call set next event right away. > > > > > + break; > > > + case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED: > > > + case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN: > > > + default: > > > + /* No more interrupts will occur as source is disabled */ > > > + break; > > > + } > > > +} > > > > Looks good otherwise. > > Hi Thomas, > > Can I consider the 8.1 patch (the one taking into account your comment) as > acked-by ? Yes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html