On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:02:06 +0200
Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:16:50AM +0200, Marek Behún wrote:
>
> Hi Marek,
>
> > By using struct led_init_data when registering we do not need to parse
> > `label` DT property nor `linux,default-trigger` property.
> >
> > Also, move forward from platform data to device tree only:
> > since commit c7896490dd1a ("leds: ns2: Absorb platform data") the
> > platform data structure is absorbed into the driver, because nothing
> > else in the source tree used it. Since nobody complained and all usage
>
> Well, I probably should have...
>
> I am using this driver on the Seagate Superbee NAS devices. This devices
> are based on a x86 SoC. Since I have been unable to get from the ODM the
> LED information written in the ACPI tables, then platform data are used
> to pass the LED description to the driver.
>
> The support of this boards is not available mainline yet but it is still
> on my todo list. So that's why I am complaining right now :) If it is
> not too much trouble I'd like to keep platform data support in this
> driver.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Simon
>
Simon, what if we refactored the driver to use fwnode API instead of OF
API? Then if it is impossible for you to write DTS for that device,
instead of platform data you could implement your device via swnode
fwnodes. :)
static const struct property_entry entries[] = {
PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("compatible", "lacie,ns2-leds"),
...
};
Look at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_laptop.c?h=v5.9-rc5
search for PROPERTY_ENTRY.
I am willing to work on this with you, but I would really like to rid
the LED drivers of platform data.
Marek
