Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: Correct interrupt flags in examples

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:54:11AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:59:22 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
> > These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
> > have the same meaning:
> > 1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> > 2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW  = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> > 
> > Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted some
> > logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
> >   ACTIVE_LOW => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/power/supply/act8945a-charger.txt       | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> 
> Applied, thanks!

Hi Rob,

Did you mean Acked-by or are you taking this patch directly?

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux