Re: is 'dynamic-power-coefficient' expected to be based on 'real' power measurements?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+Thermal folks

Hi Rajendra,

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:14:00AM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> There has been some discussions on another thread [1] around the DPC (dynamic-power-coefficient) values
> for CPU's being relative vs absolute (based on real power) and should they be used to derive 'real' power
> at various OPPs in order to calculate things like 'sustainable-power' for thermal zones.
> I believe relative values work perfectly fine for scheduling decisions, but with others using this for
> calculating power values in mW, is there a need to document the property as something that *has* to be
> based on real power measurements?

Relative values may work for scheduling decisions, but not for thermal
management with the power allocator, at least not when CPU cooling devices
are combined with others that specify their power consumption in absolute
values. Such a configuration should be supported IMO.

Thanks

Matthias



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux