Re: [PATCH V2 08/19] irqchip: crossbar: fix checkpatch warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 11:32 -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:

Hi Jason.

> > But bugfix backports haven't been much of an issue in
> > other subsystems with fairly active whitespace/style
> > changes.
> 
> Most of the mvebu fixes we've had that failed to apply were generally
> due to a large whitespace change (dts node shuffling, admittedly not
> checkpatch-related).

So not due to this.

>   I've also frequently been stymied by code cleanups
> when using git blame to find the commit introducing a regression.

git blame -w can frequently help there.

> So, my general rule is: If you're submitting a patch to make checkpatch
> be quiet, re-assess the need.  If you're making changes and you can fix
> some checkpatch items while you're there, then do so.

Decent rule.

> There are certainly legitimate checkpatch-only patches, I just don't
> think this is one qualifies.

Of course it's the maintainer's choice (and last I saw,
that's you) to ignore whatever doesn't fit the appropriate
vision for the code.

$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:IRQCHIP DRIVERS)
Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:IRQCHIP DRIVERS)
...

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux