Hi Crystal,
On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 14:07 +0800, Crystal Guo wrote:
[...]
> Should I add the SoC-specific data as follows?
> This may also modify the ti original code, is it OK?
>
> + data->reset_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + list = of_get_property(np, data->reset_data->reset_bits, &size);
>
> +static const struct common_reset_data ti_reset_data = {
> + .reset_op_available = false,
> + .reset_bits = "ti, reset-bits",
^
That space doesn't belong there.
> +};
> +
> +static const struct common_reset_data mediatek_reset_data = {
> + .reset_op_available = true,
> + .reset_bits = "mediatek, reset-bits",
> +};
I understand Robs comments as meaning "ti,reset-bits" should have been
called "reset-bits" in the first place, and you shouldn't repeat adding
the vendor prefix, as that is implied by the compatible. So this should
probably be just "reset-bits".
Otherwise this looks like it should work.
regards
Philipp
