On Fri, 4 Sep 2020, Ben Levinsky wrote: > Add binding for ZynqMP R5 OpenAMP. > > Represent the RPU domain resources in one device node. Each RPU > processor is a subnode of the top RPU domain node. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wu <j.wu@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Wendy Liang <jliang@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v3: > - update zynqmp_r5 yaml parsing to not raise warnings for extra > information in children of R5 node. The warning "node has a unit > name, but no reg or ranges property" will still be raised though > as this particular node is needed to describe the > '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' information. > v4:: > - remove warning '/example-0/rpu@ff9a0000/r5@0: > node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property' > by adding reg to r5 node. > v5: > - update device tree sample and yaml parsing to not raise any warnings > - description for memory-region in yaml parsing > - compatible string in yaml parsing for TCM > v6: > - remove coupling TCM nodes with remoteproc > - remove mailbox as it is optional not needed > v7: > - change lockstep-mode to xlnx,cluster-mode > v9: > - show example IPC nodes and tcm bank nodes > v11: > - add property meta-memory-regions to illustrate link > between r5 and TCM banks > - update so no warnings from 'make dt_binding_check' > --- > .../xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml | 123 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..148374c61908 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml#"; > +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"; > + > +title: Xilinx R5 remote processor controller bindings > + > +description: > + This document defines the binding for the remoteproc component that loads and > + boots firmwares on the Xilinx Zynqmp and Versal family chipset. > + > + Note that the Linux has global addressing view of the R5-related memory (TCM) > + so the absolute address ranges are provided in TCM reg's. > +maintainers: > + - Ed Mooring <ed.mooring@xxxxxxxxxx> > + - Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@xxxxxxxxxx> > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + const: "xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc-1.0" > + > + lockstep-mode: > + description: > + R5 core configuration (split is 0 or lock-step and 1) > + maxItems: 1 > + > + interrupts: > + description: > + Interrupt mapping for remoteproc IPI. It is required if the > + user uses the remoteproc driver with the RPMsg kernel driver. > + maxItems: 6 > + > + memory-region: > + description: > + collection of memory carveouts used for elf-loading and inter-processor > + communication. > + maxItems: 4 > + minItems: 4 > + meta-memory-regions: > + description: > + collection of memories that are not present in the top level memory > + nodes' mapping. For example, R5s' TCM banks. These banks are needed > + for R5 firmware meta data such as the R5 firmware's heap and stack > + pnode-id: > + maxItems: 1 > + mboxes: > + maxItems: 2 > + mbox-names: > + maxItems: 2 > + > +examples: > + - | > + reserved-memory { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + ranges; > + elf_load: rproc@3ed000000 { > + no-map; > + reg = <0x3ed00000 0x40000>; > + }; > + }; > + rpu { > + compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc-1.0"; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + ranges; > + lockstep-mode = <0>; > + r5_0 { > + ranges; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + memory-region = <&elf_load>; > + meta-memory-regions = <0x40 0x41>; > + pnode-id = <0x7>; I can see you are expecting a link from this node to the tcm nodes in the driver, but I can't find such a link in this example. > + }; > + }; > + > + /* > + * Below nodes are required if using TCM to load R5 firmware > + * if not, then either do not provide nodes are label as disabled in > + * status property > + */ > + tcm_0a@ffe00000 { > + reg = <0xffe00000 0x10000>; > + pnode-id = <0xf>; > + no-map; > + status = "okay"; > + phandle = <0x40>; > + compatible = "xlnx,tcm"; > + }; > + tcm_1a@ffe20000 { > + reg = <0xffe20000 0x10000>; > + pnode-id = <0x10>; > + no-map; > + status = "okay"; > + compatible = "xlnx,tcm"; > + phandle = <0x41>; > + }; > + > + /* > + * Below nodes are required for IPC, as Xilinx Kernel > + * can potentially have other applications that use CMA > + * and conflict from hardware design. With that in mind, > + * explicitly state the address spaces for the IPC remoteproc > + * mechanisms. > + * > + * If IPC not required and only elf-loading then these are not needed. > + */ > + rpu0vdev0vring0: rpu0vdev0vring0@3ed40000 { > + no-map; > + reg = <0x3ed40000 0x4000>; > + }; > + rpu0vdev0vring1: rpu0vdev0vring1@3ed44000 { > + no-map; > + reg = <0x3ed44000 0x4000>; > + }; > + rpu0vdev0buffer: rpu0vdev0buffer@3ed48000 { > + no-map; > + reg = <0x3ed48000 0x100000>; > + }; Shouldn't they be under reserved-memory?
