On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:14 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Sep 2020, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Saturday, September 5, 2020, Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
...
> > > +config PWM_NTXEC
> > > + tristate "Netronix embedded controller PWM support"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > + depends on MFD_NTXEC && OF
> >
> >
> > I don’t see need to reduce test coverage and use of the driver by sticking
> > with OF. Actually it’s not used.
>
> If the device is only known to boot with OF, then it's pointless
> building it when !OF.
No, it's not. As I pointed out the (compilation) test coverage is better.
> If you want to increase test coverage enable
> COMPILE_TEST instead.
It is one way to achieve that, yes;
depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
depends on MFD_NTXEC
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
