Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: dts: exynos: Add assigned clock parent to CMU in Exynos3250

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06.09.2020 14:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>>> index a1e93fb7f694..89b160280469 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>>> @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@
>>>   			compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-cmu";
>>>   			reg = <0x10030000 0x20000>;
>>>   			#clock-cells = <1>;
>>> +			clocks = <&cmu CLK_FIN_PLL>;
>> This is not a correct input clock for this CMU. Please assign it to 
>> xusbxti, xxti or xtcxo in the respective board dts, as this is a board 
>> property.

> Makes sense, although all this is kind of a hack as neither the bindings
> nor the driver take the input clock.

I think we should update the bindings so possible input clocks
to the CMU are documented for all SoCs. This is actually a bug 
in the clock controller DT bindings that the input clocks are
missing. Then the driver would handle both the old and the 
updated bindings but the "clocks" property would be documented 
as mandatory. I will try to have a look at this. 



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux