On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 22:33 +0300, Boris Lysov wrote:
> Example uses values for MT6589 SoC, but MT6577 was specified in "compatible" property.
>
Why do you think the example is MT6589 SoC, not MT6577?
> Signed-off-by: Boris Lysov <arzamas-16@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.txt
> index 7f0194fdd0cc..acf3d4d28b98 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.txt
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Optional properties:
> Example:
>
> i2c0: i2c@1100d000 {
> - compatible = "mediatek,mt6577-i2c";
> + compatible = "mediatek,mt6589-i2c";
> reg = <0x1100d000 0x70>,
> <0x11000300 0x80>;
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 44 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
