On 9/1/20 5:30 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Use temperature-sensor@ naming for nodes following standard conventions of device > tree (section 2.2.2 Generic Names recommendation in [1]). > > [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/tree/v0.3 > > Suggested-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx> > Suggested-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi > index bb498be2f0a4..ed42f13e7663 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi > @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ > clock-names = "gpio"; > }; > > - wkup_vtm0: thermal@42050000 { > + wkup_vtm0: temperature-sensor@42050000 { There has been a suggestion to use something like thermal-sensor during the bindings review, but it is better to use this standard node name. Reviewed-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx> regards Suman > compatible = "ti,am654-vtm"; > reg = <0x42050000 0x25c>; > power-domains = <&k3_pds 80 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>; >
