On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 08:32:01AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 21:15 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 02:17:54PM +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > > > Add development information for the devicetree files for hardware > > > by Purism SPC. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@xxxxxxx> > > > > I decided to drop this patch from my queue, as I took the suggestion > > from Joe and sent a patch to have get_maintainer report email address > > in the dts file. > > It's OK to find maintainers in files, but what about the > B: bug reporting and T: source code repository location lines, > > Those seem useful. Hmm, I doubt they are practically useful for just a number of dts files. They are more used for out-of-tree Librem5 kernel drivers, I guess. Shawn > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > [] > > > @@ -14061,6 +14061,13 @@ T: git git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git > > > F: Documentation/admin-guide/media/pulse8-cec.rst > > > F: drivers/media/cec/usb/pulse8/ > > > > > > +PURISM LIBREM 5 > > > +M: Purism Kernel Team <kernel@xxxxxxx> > > People feel like their mails go into a void when no > responses happen after sending to nameless addresses. > > It's better to have a named individual as a maintainer > rather than an unspecified exploder address. > > It's OK to have both, but just the exploder doesn't > really have that much value as it's faceless. > > > > +S: Supported > > > +B: https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/linux-next/issues > > > +T: https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/linux-next > > This T: line should be something else. > > Perhaps > W; https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/linux-next > T: git https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/linux-next.git > > > > +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-librem5* > >
