On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 01:29:17AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 06/09/2014 09:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >> + case REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY: /* switch off */ > >> + if (id != MAX77802_LDO1 && id != MAX77802_LDO20 && > >> + id != MAX77802_LDO21 && id != MAX77802_LDO3) { > >> + val = MAX77802_OPMODE_STANDBY; > >> + break; > >> + } > >> + /* no break */ > > This sounds very broken... > The problem is that not all regulators supports the same operational modes. For > instance regulators LDO 1, 20, 21 and 3 does not support REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY > so if the condition is not met a break is not needed since the default case is > to warn that the mode is not supported. No, it's the "switch off" comment... > But I'll rework that logic on v2 to make it cleaner and have a break on each > case and don't rely on case cascading. ...though you should also consider splitting things up so you have separate ops for separate regulators if they behave differently.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature