On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 06:26:46PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > + oneOf: > + - items: > + - enum: > + - fsl,imx6q-ocotp > + - fsl,imx6sl-ocotp > + - fsl,imx6sx-ocotp > + - fsl,imx6ul-ocotp > + - fsl,imx6ull-ocotp > + - fsl,imx7d-ocotp > + - fsl,imx6sll-ocotp > + - fsl,imx7ulp-ocotp > + - fsl,imx8mq-ocotp > + - fsl,imx8mm-ocotp > + - fsl,imx8mn-ocotp > + - fsl,imx8mp-ocotp > + - const: syscon > + - items: > + # The devices are not really compatible with fsl,imx8mm-ocotp, however > + # the code for getting SoC revision depends on fsl,imx8mm-ocotp compatible. Shouldn't this be fixed? It seems strange to justify a binding with existing code. Sascha > + - enum: > + - fsl,imx8mn-ocotp > + - fsl,imx8mp-ocotp > + - const: fsl,imx8mm-ocotp > + - const: syscon > > reg: > maxItems: 1 > -- > 2.17.1 > > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
