On 19/08/2020 11:04:48+0200, Reto Schneider wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > On 8/17/20 12:21 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > Thank you for this submission. > > Thanks a lot for the feedback. > > I will send a v2. > > > Overall, I'm not convinced it is a good idea to start from > > at91sam9x5ek.dtsi as it makes you dtb bigger than necessary but if you > > want it that way, I'm fine with that. > > Because using at91sam9x5ek.dtsi saves some code (maintenance effort?!) I > am willing to accept the extra binary size. > However, if you think that this causes the maintenance efforts to be > greater than when doing it your way, I'd be up for changing it. > I'd say at91sam9x5ek.dtsi has very little chances to change and even if this is the case, it will probably not break your device tree but it is still a possibility. As said, I'll let you choose. -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
